In this paper, we provide a rational analysis of the effects of sycophantic AI, considering how a Bayesian agent would respond to confirmatory evidence. Our analysis shows that such an agent will not get any closer to the truth, but will increase in their certainty about an incorrect hypothesis. We test this model in an online experiment where users are made to interact with an AI agent as they complete a rule discovery task. Our results show that the default interactions of a popular chatbot resemble the effects of providing people with confirmatory evidence, increasing confidence but bringing them no closer to the truth. These results provide a theoretical and empirical demonstration of how conversations with generative AI chatbots can facilitate delusion-like epistemic states, producing beliefs markedly divergent from reality.
�@�������x��0.03ms�iGTG�j�Ƌɂ߂đ����A�����̌������V�[���ł��c�������}�����N�b�L���Ƃ����\���Ŋy���߂��B�C���^�t�F�[�X�́A�ŐV��DisplayPort 2.1��HDMI 2.1�A�ő�90W�̋��d�ɑΉ�����USB Type-C�������Ă����A�m�[�gPC�Ƃ̐ڑ��ɂ��K���Ă����B，详情可参考WPS下载最新地址
，推荐阅读爱思助手获取更多信息
США впервые ударили по Ирану ракетой PrSM. Что о ней известно и почему ее назвали «уничтожителем» российских С-400?20:16
Последние новости，这一点在heLLoword翻译官方下载中也有详细论述
‘증시 패닉’ 어제보다 더했다…코스피 12%, 코스닥 14% 폭락