During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
自2009年起，广东省中医院每年举办“杏林寻宝”活动，引进64项特色疗法，组织跟师51项，培养院内传承人330余人次，为22名献宝人建立名医工作室并给予经费扶持，为7项特色疗法组建中医特色疗法专业小组。。关于这个话题，Line官方版本下载提供了深入分析
有一次我们骑行在太行山南麓深处，停下歇息时，走进山西省长治市平顺县北社镇西社村，才发现这里有许多建筑精美的清末民初的大院子。听当地居民说，曹家大院是晋商分支潞商文化的杰出代表，建筑风格中西合璧，最值得一看。，这一点在51吃瓜中也有详细论述
And Office for National Statistics surveys shows only one in five patients believe services have got better in the past year. The majority say they have neither improved or got worse.